Fri. Jul 18th, 2025

In a move that has sparked debate, North Carolina Governor Josh Stein recently vetoed a bill designed to make it easier for property owners to evict squatters. The bill, which had garnered support from landlords and property managers, was intended to address the growing issue of unauthorized individuals occupying properties without legal right. However, the legislation included an unexpected amendment related to pet stores, specifically concerning the sale of puppies. Governor Stein expressed concerns that the inclusion of this unrelated provision undermined the bill’s primary purpose and created potential for unintended consequences. Supporters of the bill argue that the pet store amendment was a minor addition and should not have derailed the entire legislation. They emphasize the need for efficient solutions to the squatter problem, which they believe the bill would have provided. On the other hand, critics of the bill applaud the Governor’s decision, asserting that combining unrelated issues in a single piece of legislation is poor governance. They argue that each issue should be addressed separately to ensure thorough consideration and debate. The veto has sent the bill back to the state legislature, where it may be revisited in a revised form. Lawmakers are now considering whether to reintroduce the squatter eviction measures without the controversial pet store provision. This situation highlights the complexities of the legislative process, where even well-intentioned bills can face challenges due to additional amendments. The debate also underscores the importance of ensuring that legislation remains focused on its core objectives without unnecessary add-ons. As the issue moves forward, stakeholders on both sides will be closely watching to see how the legislature proceeds. The outcome could have significant implications for property owners and squatters alike in North Carolina.

Source