The Capital Development Authority (CDA) has found itself at the center of a controversy surrounding a tender for the renovation of a minister’s house, with the authority blaming a typo for the inflated cost of Rs47 million. The tender, which was initially meant to be for a much lower amount, was published with the incorrect figure due to a clerical error. The CDA has since come under fire for the mistake, with many questioning how such a significant error could have occurred. The authority has maintained that the typo was an honest mistake and not a deliberate attempt to mislead. However, the incident has raised concerns about the transparency and accountability of the CDA’s tendering process. The minister’s house in question is located in a posh area of the city and is undergoing renovation to bring it up to modern standards. The CDA had initially estimated the cost of the renovation to be significantly lower, but the typo in the tender document meant that the figure was inflated to Rs47 million. The authority has since rectified the mistake and re-published the tender with the correct figure. Despite this, the incident has sparked a heated debate about the CDA’s handling of public funds and the need for greater transparency in its operations. The opposition has called for an investigation into the matter, alleging that the typo was not an honest mistake but rather a deliberate attempt to siphon off public funds. The government has maintained that the CDA is committed to transparency and accountability and that the typo was an isolated incident. The incident has also raised questions about the role of the CDA in the city’s development and the need for greater oversight of its operations. The CDA has a long history of controversy, with many questioning its ability to effectively manage the city’s development. The authority has been accused of corruption and mismanagement in the past, and the latest incident has only added to the perception that it is not fit for purpose. The minister’s house renovation is just one of many projects that the CDA is currently undertaking, and the authority has maintained that it is committed to delivering high-quality infrastructure to the city’s residents. However, the typo incident has raised concerns about the CDA’s ability to manage its finances effectively and to deliver projects on time and within budget. The authority has promised to take steps to prevent similar incidents in the future, including implementing new quality control measures to ensure that tender documents are accurate and free from errors. The incident has also sparked a wider debate about the need for greater transparency and accountability in government operations, with many calling for greater oversight of public funds and the introduction of more robust checks and balances to prevent corruption. The CDA has maintained that it is committed to transparency and accountability and that it will do everything in its power to prevent similar incidents in the future. The authority has also promised to cooperate fully with any investigation into the matter and to take action against anyone found to be responsible for the typo. The incident has raised concerns about the CDA’s reputation and its ability to effectively manage the city’s development, and it remains to be seen how the authority will recover from the controversy. The government has maintained that it is committed to supporting the CDA and to ensuring that it has the resources it needs to deliver high-quality infrastructure to the city’s residents. However, the opposition has called for greater action to be taken to address the concerns surrounding the CDA’s operations and to ensure that public funds are being used effectively. The incident has sparked a heated debate about the role of the CDA in the city’s development and the need for greater transparency and accountability in government operations. The CDA has promised to take steps to address the concerns surrounding its operations and to ensure that it is delivering high-quality infrastructure to the city’s residents. The authority has maintained that it is committed to transparency and accountability and that it will do everything in its power to prevent similar incidents in the future.