Civil Society Demands Repeal of Hustler Fund Amidst Concerns Over Transparency and Accountability

Civil society organizations in Kenya have come together to demand the repeal of the Hustler Fund, a brainchild of President William Ruto’s administration. The fund, which was launched in December 2022, aims to provide financial support to small-scale traders and entrepreneurs. However, civil society groups have raised concerns over the lack of transparency and accountability in the management of the fund. They argue that the fund’s management has been shrouded in secrecy, with little information available on how the funds are being allocated and utilized. Furthermore, the groups have expressed concerns over the fund’s potential to be used as a tool for political patronage, with allegations that the funds are being disbursed along party lines. The civil society organizations have also questioned the fund’s ability to address the root causes of poverty and inequality in Kenya, arguing that it is merely a band-aid solution that does not address the underlying structural issues. In addition, the groups have raised concerns over the fund’s potential to create dependency among beneficiaries, rather than empowering them to become self-sufficient. The Hustler Fund has been touted as a key component of the Ruto administration’s economic agenda, with the president promising that it will help to lift millions of Kenyans out of poverty. However, the civil society organizations argue that the fund’s implementation has been marred by a lack of consultation with stakeholders, including the public and other interested parties. They have also expressed concerns over the fund’s governance structure, which they argue is not transparent or accountable. The groups are calling for a comprehensive review of the fund’s management and governance structure, as well as a thorough audit of its finances. They are also demanding that the government provide more information on how the funds are being allocated and utilized, and that it establishes a clear and transparent criteria for selecting beneficiaries. The controversy surrounding the Hustler Fund has sparked a heated debate in Kenya, with some arguing that it is a necessary measure to support the country’s most vulnerable citizens, while others see it as a misguided attempt to buy political loyalty. The civil society organizations’ demands have been backed by some opposition politicians, who have accused the Ruto administration of using the fund to reward its supporters. The government has defended the fund, arguing that it is a necessary measure to support the country’s economic growth and development. However, the controversy surrounding the fund is likely to continue, with the civil society organizations vowing to continue their campaign for its repeal. The debate over the Hustler Fund has also highlighted the need for greater transparency and accountability in government spending, as well as the importance of ensuring that public funds are used for the benefit of all citizens, rather than just a select few. The civil society organizations’ demands have also sparked a wider conversation about the role of government in addressing poverty and inequality, and the need for more effective and sustainable solutions. In conclusion, the controversy surrounding the Hustler Fund is a complex and multifaceted issue, with different stakeholders holding varying opinions on its merits and demerits. While the government has defended the fund as a necessary measure to support the country’s economic growth and development, the civil society organizations have raised important concerns over its transparency, accountability, and effectiveness. As the debate continues, it is clear that the Hustler Fund will remain a contentious issue in Kenyan politics for some time to come.

Source