The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has been facing criticism from various quarters in Nigeria, with many expressing skepticism over the party’s ability to rescue the country from its current challenges. The critics argue that the ADC’s rhetoric of rescuing Nigeria is nothing but a mere political gimmick aimed at winning the hearts of Nigerians. They point out that the party has not provided any concrete plans or policies to address the country’s numerous problems, including poverty, insecurity, and corruption. The ADC has been trying to position itself as a viable alternative to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) and the main opposition party, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). However, the critics say that the party’s lack of a clear vision and direction makes it difficult for Nigerians to take its rescue rhetoric seriously. They also argue that the ADC’s leadership is not credible enough to lead the country out of its current challenges. The party’s national chairman, Ralph Nwosu, has been accused of being out of touch with the realities on the ground and of not having a clear understanding of the country’s problems. The critics also point out that the ADC has not been able to make any significant impact in the country’s political landscape, despite being in existence for several years. They say that the party’s inability to win any significant election or to make any meaningful contribution to the country’s governance is a clear indication of its lack of capacity to rescue Nigeria. Furthermore, the critics argue that the ADC’s rescue rhetoric is not backed by any tangible evidence or achievements. They say that the party has not been able to provide any solutions to the country’s problems, and that its leaders are only interested in using the rescue rhetoric as a means of gaining political power. The critics also express concern over the ADC’s lack of internal democracy, saying that the party’s leadership is not accountable to its members and that the party’s decision-making process is not transparent. They argue that a party that cannot manage its internal affairs effectively cannot be trusted to rescue Nigeria from its current challenges. In addition, the critics say that the ADC’s rescue rhetoric is not in tune with the realities on the ground, and that the party’s leaders are not in touch with the needs and aspirations of ordinary Nigerians. They point out that the party’s focus on rescuing Nigeria is misplaced, and that the party should rather focus on providing solutions to the country’s problems. The critics conclude that the ADC’s rescue rhetoric is nothing but a mere political gimmick, and that Nigerians will not buy into it. They advise the party to focus on providing tangible solutions to the country’s problems, rather than relying on empty rhetoric. The ADC has a lot of work to do to convince Nigerians that it is a credible alternative to the ruling APC and the main opposition PDP. The party needs to provide a clear vision and direction, and to demonstrate its capacity to lead the country out of its current challenges. The ADC also needs to improve its internal democracy and to make its decision-making process more transparent and accountable. Only then can the party hope to gain the trust and confidence of Nigerians.