The New Zealand government has announced plans to reopen offshore oil exploration, a move that has been widely condemned by environmentalists, scientists, and the general public. This decision has been deemed ‘deranged’ by many, as it disregards the overwhelming scientific evidence highlighting the devastating impacts of oil exploration on the environment. The government’s pursuit of offshore oil exploration is seen as a step backwards, particularly in light of the country’s commitment to reducing carbon emissions and transitioning to renewable energy sources. The move is also perceived as a betrayal of the government’s promise to prioritize the health and well-being of its citizens and the environment. Many are questioning the government’s motives, suggesting that the decision is driven by the interests of the oil industry rather than the needs of the people. The science is clear: offshore oil exploration poses significant risks to marine ecosystems, contributes to climate change, and threatens the livelihoods of communities that depend on the ocean. Furthermore, the economic benefits of offshore oil exploration are often overstated, and the costs of extraction and potential spills can be catastrophic. The government’s decision has been criticized by experts, who argue that it is based on flawed assumptions and ignores the reality of the situation. The move has also sparked concerns about the government’s commitment to meeting its climate change targets, as offshore oil exploration is likely to increase greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, the decision has been criticized for its potential impact on indigenous communities, who have not been adequately consulted or involved in the decision-making process. The government’s pursuit of offshore oil exploration is also seen as a missed opportunity to invest in renewable energy sources and create jobs in the clean energy sector. Many are calling for the government to reconsider its decision and prioritize the development of sustainable energy sources. The opposition to offshore oil exploration is not limited to environmentalists and scientists; many businesses and industries are also speaking out against the move, citing concerns about the potential impacts on their operations and the economy. The government’s decision has also sparked a national debate about the country’s energy future and the role of fossil fuels in it. As the world transitions to a low-carbon economy, New Zealand’s pursuit of offshore oil exploration seems out of step with the global trend. The country’s reputation as a leader in environmental protection and sustainability is also at risk of being tarnished by this decision. The government’s move has been described as ‘short-sighted’ and ‘reckless’, and many are warning that it will have long-term consequences for the environment, the economy, and the health and well-being of citizens. In conclusion, the New Zealand government’s decision to resume offshore oil exploration is a highly controversial move that has been widely criticized by experts, environmentalists, and the general public. The decision ignores scientific evidence, disregards the reality of the situation, and poses significant risks to the environment, the economy, and the health and well-being of citizens. It is imperative that the government reconsiders its decision and prioritizes the development of sustainable energy sources and the protection of the environment.