Ex-Maharashtra CM Prithviraj Chavan Slams ECI Over PM Modi’s 2020 Code Violation

The former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Prithviraj Chavan, has come down heavily on the Election Commission of India (ECI) for its inaction against Prime Minister Narendra Modi for allegedly violating the model code of conduct during the 2020 elections. Chavan stated that the ECI had failed to take necessary actions against the Prime Minister, despite being aware of the violations. The model code of conduct is a set of guidelines that are put in place to ensure fair and free elections in the country. Chavan claimed that the ECI’s inaction was a clear indication of its bias towards the ruling party. He also vowed to take legal action against the ECI for its failure to uphold the law. The controversy surrounding the model code of conduct violation by PM Modi dates back to the 2020 elections, when he allegedly made several statements that were deemed to be in violation of the code. The ECI had issued notices to the Prime Minister, but no further action was taken. Chavan criticized the ECI for not being impartial and for failing to take action against the Prime Minister. He also stated that the ECI’s inaction had undermined the integrity of the electoral process. The former CM also questioned the ECI’s independence and autonomy, stating that it was being controlled by the ruling party. Chavan’s criticism of the ECI has sparked a debate about the independence and impartiality of the electoral body. The opposition parties have been quick to support Chavan’s stance, stating that the ECI’s inaction was a clear indication of its bias towards the ruling party. The ruling party, on the other hand, has defended the ECI, stating that it was an independent body that was free to take its own decisions. The controversy has also raised questions about the effectiveness of the model code of conduct in ensuring fair and free elections. Chavan’s vow to take legal action against the ECI has added a new dimension to the controversy, with many speculating about the possible outcomes of such a move. The ECI has so far remained silent on the issue, but it is expected to respond to Chavan’s allegations in the coming days. The controversy has also sparked a debate about the role of the ECI in ensuring the integrity of the electoral process. Many have called for reforms to be made to the ECI, to ensure that it is truly independent and impartial. The opposition parties have also demanded that the ECI take immediate action against the Prime Minister for violating the model code of conduct. The controversy is likely to continue in the coming days, with many expecting it to have a significant impact on the country’s electoral landscape. The ECI’s handling of the controversy will be closely watched, with many speculating about the possible consequences of its actions. Chavan’s criticism of the ECI has also raised questions about the accountability of the electoral body. Many have called for greater transparency and accountability in the ECI’s decision-making process. The controversy has also highlighted the need for greater awareness about the model code of conduct and its importance in ensuring fair and free elections. The ECI’s failure to take action against the Prime Minister has been seen as a setback to the country’s democratic process. Chavan’s vow to take legal action against the ECI has been seen as a positive step towards ensuring the integrity of the electoral process. The outcome of the controversy is likely to have a significant impact on the country’s electoral landscape, with many speculating about the possible consequences of the ECI’s actions.

Source