Fri. Jul 18th, 2025

In a shocking statement, President Trump announced that he is considering taking away comedian Rosie O’Donnell’s U.S. citizenship. This comes after a long-standing feud between the two, with O’Donnell being an outspoken critic of the President. Trump’s statement has sparked outrage and concern among many, with some questioning the legality and constitutionality of such a move. The President’s comments were made in response to O’Donnell’s recent criticism of his administration. O’Donnell has been a vocal opponent of Trump, often using her social media platform to speak out against his policies and actions. The comedian has also been involved in several high-profile feuds with the President, including a notable incident in which she called him a ‘snake oil salesman’. Trump’s threat to revoke O’Donnell’s citizenship has been met with widespread criticism, with many arguing that it is an abuse of power and a violation of her constitutional rights. The President’s statement has also raised questions about the limits of his authority and the potential consequences of such a move. Some have pointed out that revoking someone’s citizenship is a complex and rare process, typically reserved for cases of treason or other serious crimes. Others have argued that Trump’s statement is simply a distraction from more pressing issues, such as the ongoing pandemic and economic crisis. Despite the backlash, Trump has shown no signs of backing down, with his administration refusing to comment further on the matter. The incident has highlighted the deep divisions and tensions between the President and his critics, with many fearing that such rhetoric could have serious consequences for the country. O’Donnell has yet to respond publicly to the President’s statement, but her representatives have released a statement condemning Trump’s comments as ‘un-American’ and ‘unconstitutional’. The incident has sparked a wider debate about the role of free speech and the limits of presidential power, with many calling for greater accountability and oversight. As the situation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen what actions the President will take next, and how O’Donnell and her supporters will respond. The incident has also raised questions about the potential consequences for other critics of the President, and whether they too could face similar threats and intimidation. Ultimately, the incident has highlighted the need for greater protections and safeguards for free speech and the rule of law, and the importance of holding those in power accountable for their actions.

Source