In a shocking turn of events, the French President and First Lady have filed a defamation lawsuit against Candace Owens, a prominent American conservative commentator. The lawsuit, which was filed on July 24, 2025, alleges that Owens made defamatory statements against the French President and First Lady. According to reports, Owens had made comments on social media that were deemed to be false and damaging to the reputation of the French President and First Lady. The French President and First Lady are seeking damages and a formal apology from Owens. The lawsuit is a significant development in the ongoing debate about free speech and defamation. Owens has been known for her outspoken views on politics and social issues, and has a large following on social media. However, her comments have also been criticized for being inflammatory and divisive. The French President and First Lady are not the first public figures to take legal action against Owens, as she has been sued previously for defamation. The lawsuit is likely to have significant implications for the debate about free speech and defamation, and could potentially set a precedent for future cases. The French President and First Lady have stated that they will not tolerate defamatory statements and will take all necessary steps to protect their reputation. Owens has not yet commented on the lawsuit, but it is likely that she will vigorously defend herself against the allegations. The case is expected to be closely watched by legal experts and media commentators, and could have significant implications for the future of free speech. The lawsuit is also likely to spark a wider debate about the role of social media in spreading defamatory information. As the case progresses, it will be interesting to see how the court rules on the matter and what implications this will have for future cases. The French President and First Lady have made it clear that they will not back down and will fight to protect their reputation. The lawsuit is a significant development in the ongoing debate about free speech and defamation, and could potentially have far-reaching implications. The case is expected to be a long and complex one, with both sides presenting their arguments and evidence. In the end, the court will have to decide whether Owens’ comments were defamatory and whether she should be held liable for damages. The outcome of the case will be closely watched by legal experts and media commentators, and could have significant implications for the future of free speech.