Sun. Jul 20th, 2025

Rep. Mike Waltz, a Republican from Florida, appeared before the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee for a hearing on his nomination as the US Ambassador to the United Nations. The hearing was marked by intense questioning from Democratic senators, who grilled Waltz over a Signal chat conversation that was leaked to the press. The conversation, which took place in 2021, appeared to show Waltz discussing the possibility of using the US military to intervene in the 2020 presidential election. Waltz denied that he had ever advocated for the use of military force to overturn the election results, but acknowledged that he had participated in the Signal chat conversation. The senators pressed Waltz for more information about the conversation, including the identity of the other participants and the context in which it took place. Waltz claimed that he could not remember the details of the conversation, but acknowledged that it had been a mistake to participate in it. The hearing also touched on Waltz’s views on foreign policy, including his stance on Russia and China. Waltz emphasized the importance of maintaining a strong US presence on the world stage, but faced skepticism from some senators who questioned his qualifications for the role. Despite the tough questioning, Waltz remained calm and composed throughout the hearing, reiterating his commitment to serving the US as Ambassador to the UN. The hearing was widely covered in the media, with many outlets focusing on the controversy surrounding the Signal chat conversation. The incident has sparked concerns about Waltz’s judgment and fitness for the role of Ambassador, and it remains to be seen how it will affect his nomination. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee will now review Waltz’s nomination and decide whether to send it to the full Senate for a vote. If confirmed, Waltz would replace the current Ambassador, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, who has been in the role since 2021. The US Ambassador to the UN plays a critical role in representing the country’s interests on the world stage, and the nomination process is closely watched by foreign governments and international organizations. The controversy surrounding Waltz’s nomination has also sparked a wider debate about the role of social media and encrypted messaging apps in politics, and the need for greater transparency and accountability in government. As the nomination process moves forward, it is likely that Waltz will face continued scrutiny over the Signal chat conversation and his views on foreign policy. The outcome of the nomination process remains uncertain, and it is unclear whether Waltz will ultimately be confirmed as the US Ambassador to the UN.

Source