In a recent statement, former US President Donald Trump expressed his desire to be added to the iconic Mount Rushmore monument, sparking widespread debate and criticism. However, rock experts and historians have come forward to dismiss Trump’s claim, citing the historical and logistical challenges involved in modifying the monument. Mount Rushmore, located in the Black Hills of South Dakota, features four large sculptures of prominent US presidents: George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Abraham Lincoln. The monument was designed by sculptor Gutzon Borglum and took 14 years to complete, from 1927 to 1941. The process of adding a new president to the monument would require significant changes to the existing structure, which is not feasible due to the fragile nature of the granite rock. Moreover, the monument is a protected area, and any modifications would need to be approved by the National Park Service and other regulatory bodies. Experts argue that Trump’s desire to be added to Mount Rushmore is not only impractical but also historically unjustified. The selection of presidents featured on the monument was based on their significant contributions to American history and the principles of liberty and democracy. Trump’s presidency, marked by controversy and polarization, does not meet the same standards as the other presidents featured on the monument. Furthermore, the addition of a new president would require a thorough evaluation of their legacy and impact on American history, which is not currently possible given the recency of Trump’s presidency. The debate surrounding Trump’s claim has also sparked discussions about the cultural and historical significance of Mount Rushmore, with many arguing that the monument should be preserved in its current state to maintain its integrity and historical value. Others have suggested that instead of modifying the existing monument, a new monument or memorial could be built to honor Trump’s presidency, if deemed historically significant in the future. The controversy has also highlighted the importance of preserving historical monuments and the need for careful consideration and evaluation when modifying or adding to existing cultural and historical landmarks. In conclusion, while Trump’s desire to be added to Mount Rushmore may be a personal ambition, it is not supported by historical or logistical evidence, and experts agree that the monument should be preserved in its current state. The debate surrounding this issue serves as a reminder of the importance of preserving cultural and historical heritage and the need for careful consideration when evaluating the legacy of historical figures. The discussion has also sparked a wider conversation about the role of monuments and memorials in American culture and the need for a nuanced understanding of historical context and significance. As the debate continues, it is clear that Trump’s claim will not be taken seriously by experts and historians, and the monument will remain a testament to the enduring legacy of the four presidents currently featured. The preservation of Mount Rushmore is crucial to maintaining its historical and cultural significance, and any attempts to modify it would be met with significant resistance from experts, historians, and the general public. Ultimately, the decision to add a new president to the monument would require a thorough evaluation of their legacy and impact on American history, and Trump’s presidency does not currently meet the standards required for such an honor. The controversy surrounding Trump’s claim has also highlighted the importance of critical thinking and nuanced understanding when evaluating historical figures and cultural landmarks. As the conversation continues, it is essential to approach the topic with a critical and informed perspective, recognizing the historical and cultural significance of Mount Rushmore and the importance of preserving its integrity. In the end, the experts’ verdict is clear: Trump’s Mount Rushmore dreams are nothing more than a fantasy, and the monument will remain a revered and historic symbol of American democracy and culture.