The debate over the removal of tainted politicians from public office has gained momentum in India, with senior Congress leader Kapil Sibal countering Union Home Minister Amit Shah’s morality pitch. Sibal questioned the morality of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government, asking if any of its ministers had been arrested despite facing allegations of corruption and other crimes. The BJP has been pushing for the removal of politicians with criminal backgrounds, but Sibal argued that the party’s own ministers have been accused of various crimes. He cited the example of BJP ministers who have been accused of corruption, but have not been arrested or removed from their positions. Sibal also pointed out that the BJP government has been criticized for its handling of corruption cases, with many accusing the party of protecting its own leaders. The Congress leader argued that the BJP’s morality pitch is hypocritical, given the party’s own record on corruption. He also questioned the government’s commitment to fighting corruption, citing the example of the Rafale deal and other high-profile corruption cases. The BJP has been facing criticism over its handling of corruption cases, with many accusing the party of using its power to protect its own leaders. The opposition parties have been demanding the removal of tainted politicians from public office, but the BJP has been resisting these demands. The debate over the removal of tainted politicians has been ongoing for several years, with many arguing that it is necessary to clean up Indian politics. However, others have argued that the move could be used to target political opponents. The Supreme Court has also been hearing a petition on the issue, with the court seeking responses from the government and the Election Commission. The petition has argued that the current system allows politicians with criminal backgrounds to contest elections and hold public office. The court has been critical of the government’s handling of corruption cases, with the judges expressing concern over the growing number of politicians with criminal backgrounds. The issue has also been debated in parliament, with opposition parties demanding the removal of tainted politicians. The BJP has been arguing that the opposition parties are trying to politicize the issue, but the opposition has countered that the BJP is trying to protect its own leaders. The debate is likely to continue, with the Supreme Court’s verdict expected to have a significant impact on Indian politics. The issue has also sparked a wider debate over the need for electoral reforms in India, with many arguing that the current system is flawed. The government has been facing criticism over its handling of corruption cases, with many accusing the party of using its power to protect its own leaders. The opposition parties have been demanding greater transparency and accountability in government, but the BJP has been resisting these demands. The debate over the removal of tainted politicians is likely to continue, with the issue expected to be a major point of contention in the upcoming elections. The Supreme Court’s verdict is expected to have a significant impact on Indian politics, with the court’s decision likely to be seen as a major victory for either the government or the opposition. The issue has also sparked a wider debate over the need for electoral reforms in India, with many arguing that the current system is flawed and in need of reform. The government has been facing criticism over its handling of corruption cases, with many accusing the party of using its power to protect its own leaders. The opposition parties have been demanding greater transparency and accountability in government, but the BJP has been resisting these demands. The debate is likely to continue, with the issue expected to be a major point of contention in the upcoming elections.