Federal Judge Dismisses Trump Lawsuit Against New York Times and His Niece

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by former President Donald Trump against The New York Times and his niece, Mary Trump, over the publication of his tax returns. The lawsuit, which was filed in 2020, alleged that the newspaper and Mary Trump had conspired to obtain and publish Trump’s tax returns in violation of a confidentiality agreement. However, the judge ruled that the lawsuit was without merit and that the defendants had not violated any laws or agreements. The New York Times had published a series of articles in 2019 based on Trump’s tax returns, which showed that he had paid little to no income tax in several years. The articles were widely reported and sparked a national conversation about Trump’s finances and tax policies. Mary Trump, who is the daughter of Trump’s brother Fred, had provided the tax returns to the newspaper. She had previously written a book about her family and had been a vocal critic of her uncle’s presidency. The lawsuit alleged that Mary Trump had violated a confidentiality agreement that she had signed as part of a settlement in a dispute over her father’s estate. However, the judge ruled that the agreement did not apply to the tax returns, which were public records. The judge also ruled that The New York Times had not violated any laws or agreements by publishing the tax returns. The newspaper had argued that the publication of the tax returns was protected by the First Amendment and that it had a right to report on matters of public interest. The dismissal of the lawsuit is a significant victory for The New York Times and Mary Trump, who had faced intense scrutiny and criticism from Trump and his supporters. The lawsuit had been seen as an attempt by Trump to silence his critics and to prevent the publication of information that was damaging to his reputation. The dismissal of the lawsuit is also a significant defeat for Trump, who has a long history of using lawsuits to try to silence his critics and to intimidate his opponents. The case had been closely watched by journalists and First Amendment advocates, who had argued that the lawsuit was an attempt to chill free speech and to prevent the publication of information that was in the public interest. The judge’s ruling is a significant affirmation of the importance of a free press and the right of journalists to report on matters of public interest. The case is also a reminder of the importance of protecting sources and the confidentiality of journalists’ sources. The New York Times had argued that the publication of the tax returns was necessary to inform the public about Trump’s finances and tax policies, and that it had a right to report on matters of public interest. The judge’s ruling is a significant victory for the newspaper and for the public’s right to know. The case is likely to be appealed, but for now, the dismissal of the lawsuit is a significant win for The New York Times and Mary Trump. The lawsuit had been filed in the Southern District of New York and had been assigned to Judge Ronnie Abrams. The judge had previously ruled that the lawsuit could proceed, but had also expressed skepticism about the merits of the case. The dismissal of the lawsuit is a significant development in the ongoing saga of Trump’s finances and tax policies, which have been the subject of intense scrutiny and controversy. The case is a reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability in government and the need for a free press to hold public officials accountable for their actions.

Source