Kerala High Court Seeks Clarification on Sanction to Prosecute ADGP in Disproportionate Assets Case

The Kerala High Court has sought clarification from the state government on whether it had obtained the necessary sanction to prosecute Additional Director General of Police (ADGP) in a disproportionate assets case. The court’s directive comes in the wake of a petition filed by the ADGP, challenging the proceedings against him. The ADGP had argued that the state government had not obtained the requisite sanction under the Prevention of Corruption Act to prosecute him. The court has asked the state government to file an affidavit stating whether it had obtained the sanction and if so, the details of the same. The case against the ADGP was registered by the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB) in 2020, alleging that he had amassed wealth disproportionate to his known sources of income. The VACB had conducted a raid at the ADGP’s residence and seized several documents and valuables. The ADGP had denied all allegations, stating that the raid was conducted with malafide intentions. The court’s decision to seek clarification on the sanction issue has raised questions about the validity of the proceedings against the ADGP. The state government has been given a week’s time to file the affidavit. The case has sparked a debate about the need for sanction to prosecute public servants. The ADGP’s petition had argued that the sanction was necessary to ensure that public servants were not harassed by false allegations. The court’s decision is expected to have implications for similar cases in the future. The Kerala High Court has been proactive in ensuring that the rule of law is upheld in the state. The court has been hearing several cases related to corruption and disproportionate assets. The state government has been facing criticism for its handling of corruption cases. The opposition parties have been alleging that the government is not doing enough to tackle corruption. The case against the ADGP is one of the several cases that have been registered against public servants in the state. The VACB has been conducting raids and investigations against several public servants, including politicians and bureaucrats. The agency has been facing criticism for its methods, with some alleging that it is being used as a tool to harass opponents. The Kerala High Court’s decision to seek clarification on the sanction issue is expected to bring transparency and accountability to the proceedings. The court’s directive is also expected to ensure that the rights of public servants are protected. The case is likely to have far-reaching implications for the state’s anti-corruption efforts. The Kerala government has been facing pressure to tackle corruption and ensure that public servants are held accountable. The case against the ADGP is a test case for the government’s commitment to fighting corruption. The Kerala High Court’s decision is expected to be closely watched by the public and the media. The court’s directive has raised hopes that the case will be decided on its merits, rather than being influenced by political considerations. The ADGP’s petition had argued that the case against him was politically motivated. The court’s decision to seek clarification on the sanction issue has raised questions about the role of politics in influencing the prosecution of public servants. The Kerala High Court’s decision is expected to bring clarity on the issue and ensure that the rule of law is upheld.

Source