Gujarat High Court Lawyers Protest Against Transfer of Justice Sandeep Bhatt

The Gujarat High Court has been witnessing a series of protests by lawyers against the transfer of Justice Sandeep Bhatt to the Andhra Pradesh High Court. The lawyers are upset with the Supreme Court collegium’s decision, which they claim is unfair and unjust. Justice Bhatt has been a prominent figure in the Gujarat High Court, known for his bold and unbiased judgments. The lawyers argue that his transfer will lead to a vacuum in the court and affect the administration of justice. The protests began on February 10, with lawyers boycotting court proceedings and holding demonstrations outside the court premises. The Gujarat High Court Advocates Association has also issued a statement condemning the transfer and demanding that the Supreme Court collegium reconsider its decision. The association has claimed that the transfer is a result of Justice Bhatt’s orders in certain cases, which have gone against the interests of the ruling party. The lawyers have also alleged that the transfer is an attempt to undermine the independence of the judiciary. The protests have been peaceful so far, but the lawyers have warned that they will intensify their agitation if their demands are not met. The Gujarat High Court Bar Association has also joined the protests, with its members boycotting court proceedings and participating in demonstrations. The association has claimed that the transfer of Justice Bhatt will have far-reaching consequences for the judiciary and the legal profession. The lawyers have also expressed concerns over the lack of transparency in the transfer process, claiming that the Supreme Court collegium has not provided any reasons for the transfer. The protests have been supported by various political parties, including the Congress and the Aam Aadmi Party. The parties have claimed that the transfer is a result of the ruling party’s attempts to influence the judiciary. The Gujarat High Court has a long history of independence and has been known for its bold judgments. The transfer of Justice Bhatt has raised concerns over the future of the judiciary and the rule of law in the state. The lawyers have vowed to continue their protests until the Supreme Court collegium reverses its decision. The protests have also sparked a debate over the role of the judiciary in a democratic society. The lawyers have argued that the judiciary is the last bastion of hope for the common man and that any attempt to undermine its independence will have serious consequences for the country. The protests are a testament to the commitment of the lawyers to the cause of justice and their determination to protect the independence of the judiciary. The transfer of Justice Bhatt has also raised questions over the accountability of the Supreme Court collegium. The lawyers have demanded that the collegium provide reasons for the transfer and that it be made accountable for its decisions. The protests are likely to continue in the coming days, with the lawyers determined to fight for the cause of justice and the independence of the judiciary.

Source