The Canadian economy has been facing a significant challenge in recent years, with various industries relying heavily on government subsidies and handouts. This has led to a lack of innovation and competitiveness, ultimately hindering the country’s ability to achieve sustainable growth. According to a recent opinion piece, the industries’ addiction to Ottawa’s largess has stopped dead the agenda of former Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney, who had aimed to promote economic growth through monetary policy. The piece argues that the government’s willingness to provide subsidies has created a culture of dependency, where industries rely on handouts rather than investing in research and development. This has resulted in a lack of competitiveness, making it difficult for Canadian businesses to compete in the global market. The article cites the example of the automotive industry, which has received significant subsidies from the government, but has failed to invest in new technologies and innovation. Similarly, the energy sector has also received substantial handouts, but has not been able to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions. The piece argues that the government’s approach has created a moral hazard, where industries take risks knowing that they will be bailed out by the government. This has led to a lack of accountability and a culture of entitlement, where industries expect to receive subsidies without having to make any significant changes. The article also points out that the government’s subsidies have not been effective in creating jobs or promoting economic growth. In fact, the piece argues that the subsidies have actually hindered economic growth by creating a culture of dependency and reducing the incentive for industries to innovate. The author of the piece suggests that the government should adopt a more nuanced approach, where subsidies are tied to specific outcomes and industries are incentivized to invest in research and development. This would help to promote innovation and competitiveness, ultimately leading to sustainable economic growth. The piece also argues that the government should prioritize investments in education and training, to help workers develop the skills they need to compete in the global market. Furthermore, the article suggests that the government should implement policies to promote competition and reduce barriers to entry, to help new businesses emerge and compete with established industries. The author also points out that the government’s approach has significant implications for the country’s trade relationships, as industries that rely on subsidies may not be able to compete with foreign businesses. The piece argues that the government should prioritize trade agreements that promote fair competition and reduce trade barriers, to help Canadian businesses compete in the global market. In conclusion, the article argues that the Canadian economy is facing a significant challenge due to industries’ addiction to government subsidies, and that a new approach is needed to promote sustainable economic growth. The government should prioritize investments in innovation and competitiveness, and implement policies to reduce the culture of dependency and promote fair competition. This would help to create a more dynamic and competitive economy, ultimately leading to higher living standards for Canadians. The piece also suggests that the government should engage in a national conversation about the role of subsidies in the economy, and work to develop a more nuanced approach that promotes innovation and competitiveness. By doing so, the government can help to create a more sustainable and prosperous economy for future generations. The article’s author also emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability in the government’s subsidy programs, to ensure that taxpayers’ money is being used effectively. Overall, the piece provides a thought-provoking analysis of the challenges facing the Canadian economy, and offers a number of suggestions for how the government can promote sustainable economic growth.