Hungary’s Minister of Agriculture, Istvan Nagy, has stressed the need to protect European Union funds allocated for the country’s farmers. This comes at a time when Hungary is engaged in ongoing disputes with the EU over various issues, including the rule of law and the management of EU funds. Nagy’s statement highlights the critical role these funds play in supporting Hungarian agriculture and the potential consequences of their withdrawal. The EU has been a significant source of financial support for Hungary’s agricultural sector, with billions of euros allocated annually. However, the current disputes have raised concerns about the future of these funds and their potential impact on Hungarian farmers. Nagy’s call to action emphasizes the importance of finding a resolution to these disputes to ensure the continued support of the agricultural sector. The Hungarian government has been working to address the EU’s concerns, but progress has been slow. In the meantime, farmers are facing uncertainty about their future funding, which could have significant implications for the country’s food production and economy. The EU’s concerns about the rule of law in Hungary have been a major point of contention, with the European Commission launching several infringement procedures against the country. These procedures have led to a freeze on certain EU funds, which has further exacerbated the situation. Despite these challenges, Nagy remains committed to finding a solution that will protect the interests of Hungarian farmers. He has been working closely with EU officials to address their concerns and find a way forward. The importance of EU funds for Hungarian farmers cannot be overstated, as they provide critical support for agricultural production and rural development. Without these funds, many farmers would struggle to remain viable, which could have significant consequences for the country’s food security. Nagy’s statement has been welcomed by farmers’ organizations, who have been calling for greater clarity on the future of EU funding. They argue that the uncertainty surrounding these funds is having a negative impact on their businesses and is making it difficult for them to plan for the future. The Hungarian government has also been criticized for its handling of EU funds, with some arguing that it has not done enough to address the EU’s concerns. However, Nagy’s statement suggests that the government is taking the issue seriously and is committed to finding a resolution. The ongoing disputes between Hungary and the EU have significant implications for the country’s agricultural sector and the wider economy. The EU has been a major market for Hungarian agricultural products, and any disruption to trade could have significant consequences. Nagy’s call to protect EU funds for farmers is therefore not just about supporting the agricultural sector, but also about ensuring the long-term viability of the Hungarian economy. As the situation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether Nagy’s efforts will be successful in protecting EU funds for Hungarian farmers. However, his statement has highlighted the critical importance of these funds and the need for a resolution to the ongoing disputes. The EU’s commitment to supporting Hungarian farmers is also evident, with the European Commission having allocated significant funds to support the country’s agricultural sector. However, the current disputes have raised concerns about the future of these funds and the potential impact on Hungarian farmers. In conclusion, the protection of EU funds for Hungarian farmers is a critical issue that requires urgent attention. Nagy’s statement has highlighted the importance of finding a resolution to the ongoing disputes and ensuring the continued support of the agricultural sector. The Hungarian government, EU officials, and farmers’ organizations must work together to address the EU’s concerns and find a way forward that protects the interests of Hungarian farmers.