The legal counsel for Bikram Majithia, a former minister in the Punjab government, has made a startling claim that the prosecution is fabricating evidence in the disproportionate assets (DA) case against him. The counsel has demanded a probe into the matter by new DSPs and SSPs, citing a lack of proof against Majithia. The case, which has been ongoing for several years, has seen numerous twists and turns, with the prosecution alleging that Majithia had amassed wealth disproportionate to his known sources of income. However, Majithia’s counsel has consistently maintained that the allegations are false and that the prosecution is trying to frame him. The counsel has pointed out that the prosecution has failed to provide any concrete evidence to support its claims, and that the investigation has been botched from the start. The demand for a new probe by fresh officers is seen as a bid to ensure a fair and impartial investigation. The case has significant implications for Majithia’s political career, and the outcome is being closely watched by his supporters and opponents alike. The prosecution, on the other hand, has maintained that it has a strong case against Majithia and that the evidence will speak for itself. The court is expected to hear the matter soon, and a verdict is likely to be delivered in the coming weeks. The case has also sparked a debate about the politicization of the justice system, with some arguing that the prosecution is being driven by political motivations rather than a genuine desire to uphold the law. Others have pointed out that the case highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in the investigation process. The Indian Express has learned that the prosecution has been facing criticism for its handling of the case, with some questioning the credibility of the evidence presented so far. The case has also raised questions about the role of the media in reporting on high-profile cases, with some arguing that the coverage has been sensationalized and biased. Despite the controversy surrounding the case, Majithia remains a prominent figure in Punjab politics, and his supporters continue to rally around him. The case is seen as a test of the justice system’s ability to deliver a fair verdict, and the outcome is likely to have significant implications for the political landscape of the state. The Indian Express will continue to provide updates on the case as more information becomes available. In the meantime, the people of Punjab wait with bated breath for the verdict, which is expected to be delivered soon. The case has also sparked a wider debate about the need for greater transparency and accountability in government, with some arguing that the case highlights the need for stricter laws and regulations to prevent corruption. Others have pointed out that the case is a reminder of the importance of a free and independent media in holding those in power accountable. The Indian Express has learned that the case has been widely followed in the state, with many seeing it as a symbol of the broader struggle against corruption and injustice. As the case nears its conclusion, the people of Punjab are eagerly awaiting the verdict, which is expected to be delivered soon. The case has also raised questions about the role of the opposition in holding the government accountable, with some arguing that the opposition has failed to provide adequate scrutiny of the government’s actions. Others have pointed out that the case highlights the need for greater cooperation between the government and the opposition in the fight against corruption. The Indian Express will continue to provide updates on the case as more information becomes available.