A recent presentation at Morehead State University has sparked discussion among academics regarding the implementation of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives. The professor, who wishes to remain anonymous, offered guidance to peers on navigating these requirements while preserving academic freedom. The presentation emphasized the importance of understanding the context and motivations behind DEI policies. By being aware of the potential implications, faculty members can better position themselves to address concerns and find ways to comply without compromising their academic integrity. The professor suggested that faculty should be ‘wily’ in their approach, using creative strategies to meet DEI requirements without sacrificing their values or autonomy. This might involve rephrasing course descriptions, incorporating diverse perspectives into curricula, and engaging in self-reflection to identify potential biases. The presentation also highlighted the need for faculty to be proactive in addressing DEI concerns, rather than simply reacting to criticism. By taking a proactive approach, faculty can help shape the narrative around DEI initiatives and ensure that they are implemented in a way that supports academic freedom. Furthermore, the professor encouraged peers to seek support from colleagues and administrators who share their concerns. Building a network of like-minded individuals can provide a sense of community and help faculty navigate the complexities of DEI requirements. The presentation also touched on the importance of documenting efforts to comply with DEI initiatives, as this can help demonstrate a commitment to diversity and inclusion. Additionally, the professor suggested that faculty should be prepared to address potential criticisms or backlash from students or administrators. By being transparent and open to feedback, faculty can help build trust and foster a more positive dialogue around DEI initiatives. The discussion around DEI requirements is not unique to Morehead State University, as institutions across the country are grappling with similar issues. The professor’s presentation serves as a reminder that faculty must be proactive and strategic in their approach to DEI initiatives, balancing the need to comply with requirements while protecting academic freedom. In conclusion, the presentation at Morehead State University highlights the complexities and challenges associated with implementing DEI initiatives in higher education. By being informed, proactive, and strategic, faculty can navigate these requirements while maintaining their academic integrity. The professor’s advice serves as a valuable reminder of the importance of academic freedom and the need for faculty to be ‘wily’ in their approach to DEI initiatives. As the conversation around DEI continues to evolve, it is essential for faculty to remain vigilant and engaged, ensuring that these initiatives support the values of higher education. The presentation has sparked a necessary discussion among academics, and its implications will likely be felt across the country. The importance of balancing DEI requirements with academic freedom cannot be overstated, and the professor’s guidance provides a valuable framework for navigating these complex issues. Ultimately, the goal of DEI initiatives should be to promote a more inclusive and equitable learning environment, while also protecting the academic freedom that is essential to higher education. By working together and sharing strategies, faculty can help ensure that DEI initiatives are implemented in a way that supports these values. The professor’s presentation serves as a call to action, encouraging faculty to be proactive and engaged in the conversation around DEI initiatives. As institutions continue to grapple with these issues, the need for faculty to be ‘wily’ and strategic in their approach will only continue to grow. The presentation at Morehead State University is just the beginning of a larger conversation, one that will require faculty to be informed, engaged, and committed to protecting academic freedom. In the end, the success of DEI initiatives will depend on the ability of faculty to navigate these complex issues while maintaining their academic integrity.