Nigerian Manufacturers Reject Reintroduced 4% FOB Charge, Cite Rising Production Costs

The Nigerian manufacturing sector has expressed strong opposition to the recently reintroduced 4% Freight on Board (FOB) charge, citing concerns over rising production costs and potential economic implications. The FOB charge, which was initially introduced in 2013 but later suspended, has been reinstated by the Nigerian government, sparking widespread criticism from manufacturers. According to industry stakeholders, the reintroduced charge will lead to increased production costs, which may be passed on to consumers, resulting in higher prices for goods and services. This, in turn, could lead to a decline in demand, ultimately affecting the overall economy. Manufacturers argue that the FOB charge will disproportionately affect small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which are already struggling to stay afloat due to the challenging business environment in Nigeria. The Nigerian Manufacturers Association (NMA) has warned that the reintroduced charge may lead to job losses, as companies may be forced to downsize or shut down operations to remain competitive. Furthermore, the NMA has expressed concerns that the FOB charge will undermine the government’s efforts to promote economic diversification and growth. The association has called on the government to reconsider the reintroduction of the FOB charge, citing the need for a more comprehensive and inclusive approach to revenue generation. In addition to the NMA, other industry stakeholders, including the Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI) and the Nigerian Association of Small and Medium Enterprises (NASME), have also voiced their opposition to the reintroduced charge. These stakeholders argue that the FOB charge will have far-reaching consequences for the Nigerian economy, including increased inflation, reduced competitiveness, and decreased foreign investment. The reintroduced FOB charge has also been criticized for its potential impact on the country’s trade relationships, particularly with neighboring countries. Manufacturers have warned that the charge may lead to retaliatory measures from other countries, resulting in reduced trade volumes and economic losses. In response to the opposition, the Nigerian government has defended the reintroduction of the FOB charge, citing the need to generate revenue and promote economic growth. However, industry stakeholders remain skeptical, arguing that the government has not provided sufficient evidence to support the reintroduction of the charge. As the debate over the FOB charge continues, manufacturers are calling on the government to engage in constructive dialogue and consider alternative revenue generation strategies that do not disproportionately affect the manufacturing sector. The Nigerian government has been urged to prioritize the development of the manufacturing sector, which is seen as critical to the country’s economic growth and diversification. In conclusion, the reintroduced 4% FOB charge has sparked widespread opposition from manufacturers in Nigeria, who warn of rising production costs and potential economic implications. As the government and industry stakeholders continue to debate the issue, it remains to be seen whether the FOB charge will be revised or repealed.

Source