Thu. Aug 28th, 2025

The recent announcement by the Revenue Mobilisation, Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) to raise the salaries of politicians in Nigeria has sparked widespread outrage and criticism. Former Oyo State Governor, Abiola Ajimobi, has joined the chorus of dissenting voices, condemning the move as unfair and unjust. According to Ajimobi, it is unacceptable to increase the salaries of politicians while leaving civil servants to struggle with poverty. He argued that the move would further widen the gap between the rich and the poor in the country. The former governor emphasized that the RMAFC should prioritize the welfare of civil servants, who are the backbone of the country’s bureaucracy. He noted that civil servants are the ones who work tirelessly to implement government policies and programs, yet they are often neglected and underpaid. Ajimobi also pointed out that the proposed salary increase for politicians would be a misplaced priority, given the country’s current economic challenges. He urged the RMAFC to reconsider its decision and focus on addressing the plight of civil servants. The controversy surrounding the proposed salary increase has highlighted the long-standing issue of inequality in Nigeria’s public sector. While politicians and top government officials enjoy lucrative salaries and benefits, civil servants often struggle to make ends meet. The situation has led to widespread discontent and frustration among civil servants, who feel that their contributions to the country’s development are not being recognized or rewarded. The Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC) has also weighed in on the issue, condemning the proposed salary increase as a slap in the face of civil servants. The NLC argued that the move would be a clear indication that the government is not committed to addressing the welfare of its workers. The controversy has also sparked a national debate about the need for a comprehensive review of the country’s salary structure. Many Nigerians are calling for a more equitable and fair salary system that reflects the contributions and sacrifices of all public sector workers. The RMAFC has defended its decision, citing the need to attract and retain top talent in the political sphere. However, critics argue that the move would be a waste of public funds and would not address the underlying issues facing the country. As the controversy continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether the RMAFC will reconsider its decision and prioritize the welfare of civil servants. The outcome of the debate will have significant implications for the country’s public sector and the welfare of its workers. In the meantime, Nigerians will be watching with keen interest to see how the situation unfolds. The country’s economic challenges, including a high unemployment rate and a large budget deficit, have made it imperative for the government to prioritize its spending and ensure that public funds are used judiciously. The proposed salary increase for politicians has raised questions about the government’s commitment to transparency and accountability. Many Nigerians are demanding that the government provide a clear explanation for the proposed salary increase and justify how it will benefit the country. The controversy has also highlighted the need for a more inclusive and participatory approach to decision-making in Nigeria’s public sector. Civil servants and other stakeholders should be involved in the decision-making process to ensure that their concerns and interests are taken into account. Ultimately, the outcome of the controversy will depend on the ability of the government to listen to the concerns of its citizens and prioritize their welfare. The situation has sparked a national conversation about the need for a more equitable and just society, where the contributions of all citizens are recognized and rewarded. As the debate continues, it is clear that the proposed salary increase for politicians has touched a raw nerve in Nigeria, highlighting the deep-seated issues of inequality and injustice that need to be addressed.

Source