An Oregon deputy who was left blind after being shot during an eviction procedure has filed a lawsuit against the property owners, alleging that they failed to provide adequate warning of the potential dangers on the property. The incident occurred in 2020 when the deputy, along with other law enforcement officers, arrived at the property to serve an eviction notice. The property owner, who was reportedly emotionally disturbed, opened fire on the officers, striking the deputy in the head and causing permanent blindness. The deputy, who has undergone extensive medical treatment and rehabilitation, is now seeking $23 million in damages for his injuries and loss of livelihood. The lawsuit alleges that the property owners were aware of the potential dangers on the property and failed to take adequate measures to prevent the incident. The property owners have denied any wrongdoing and claim that they were not responsible for the actions of the emotionally disturbed individual. The case has sparked debate about the responsibilities of property owners and the risks faced by law enforcement officers during eviction procedures. The deputy’s lawsuit is seeking damages for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. The case is currently pending in court and is expected to be a lengthy and complex process. The incident has also raised questions about the use of force by law enforcement officers during eviction procedures and the need for greater transparency and accountability. The deputy’s injuries have been described as catastrophic, and he is unlikely to ever regain his sight. The lawsuit is seeking damages for the deputy’s past and future medical expenses, as well as his lost wages and benefits. The property owners have been named as defendants in the lawsuit, along with several other individuals and entities. The case has been assigned to a judge and is expected to be heard in the coming months. The deputy’s attorney has stated that the lawsuit is not just about seeking damages, but also about holding the property owners accountable for their actions. The incident has had a profound impact on the deputy’s life, and he is now unable to work as a law enforcement officer. The lawsuit is seeking damages for the deputy’s loss of livelihood, as well as his pain and suffering. The case has sparked widespread media attention and has raised questions about the risks faced by law enforcement officers during eviction procedures. The deputy’s attorney has stated that the lawsuit is a complex and challenging case, but is confident that justice will be served. The property owners have denied any wrongdoing and claim that they were not responsible for the actions of the emotionally disturbed individual. The case is expected to be a lengthy and complex process, with multiple hearings and court appearances. The deputy’s lawsuit is seeking damages for his injuries and loss of livelihood, and is also seeking to hold the property owners accountable for their actions. The incident has had a profound impact on the deputy’s life, and he is now unable to work as a law enforcement officer. The lawsuit is seeking damages for the deputy’s past and future medical expenses, as well as his lost wages and benefits. The case has sparked debate about the responsibilities of property owners and the risks faced by law enforcement officers during eviction procedures.