Kerala Raises Concerns Over Offshore Areas in Atomic Minerals Rules 2025

The Kerala government has recently voiced its opposition to the offshore areas included in the Atomic Minerals Rules 2025. The rules, which aim to regulate the exploration and mining of atomic minerals, have been met with resistance from the state government due to concerns over the potential environmental and social impacts. The Kerala government has argued that the inclusion of offshore areas in the rules could lead to the destruction of marine ecosystems and disrupt the livelihoods of coastal communities. The state government has also expressed concerns over the lack of consultation with local stakeholders and the potential for radioactive contamination. The Atomic Minerals Rules 2025 have been introduced to streamline the process of exploration and mining of atomic minerals, including uranium and thorium. However, the Kerala government has argued that the rules do not adequately address the concerns of local communities and the potential environmental impacts. The state government has also pointed out that the rules do not provide for adequate compensation for affected communities or sufficient measures for environmental protection. The opposition to the rules has been led by the Kerala Chief Minister, who has argued that the state government will not allow any activities that could harm the environment or the livelihoods of local communities. The Kerala government has also sought the intervention of the central government to address the concerns of the state. The issue has sparked a debate over the balance between economic development and environmental protection. The Kerala government has argued that the rules prioritize economic interests over environmental and social concerns. The opposition to the rules has also been supported by local communities and environmental groups, who have argued that the inclusion of offshore areas could lead to the destruction of marine ecosystems. The Kerala government has also pointed out that the rules do not provide for adequate public consultation or participation. The state government has argued that the rules should be revised to address the concerns of local communities and the potential environmental impacts. The issue has also sparked a debate over the role of the central government in regulating the exploration and mining of atomic minerals. The Kerala government has argued that the central government should play a more active role in addressing the concerns of local communities and ensuring that the rules are implemented in a way that prioritizes environmental protection. The opposition to the rules has also been supported by opposition parties, who have argued that the rules are a threat to the environment and the livelihoods of local communities. The issue is likely to continue to be a major point of contention between the Kerala government and the central government. The Kerala government has also sought the support of other state governments to oppose the rules. The issue has also sparked a debate over the potential health impacts of the exploration and mining of atomic minerals. The Kerala government has argued that the rules do not provide for adequate measures to protect the health of local communities. The state government has also pointed out that the rules do not provide for adequate compensation for affected communities. The opposition to the rules has also been supported by health experts, who have argued that the inclusion of offshore areas could lead to the exposure of local communities to radioactive contamination. The issue is likely to continue to be a major point of contention between the Kerala government and the central government.

Source