Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction for Cheque Dishonour Complaints Under Section 142 of NI Act

The Supreme Court of India has provided clarity on the jurisdiction for filing complaints related to cheque dishonour under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. This ruling is significant as it settles a long-standing debate on the appropriate jurisdiction for such cases. According to the court, the place where the payee maintains their bank account is the relevant jurisdiction for filing a complaint, rather than the place where the cheque was presented. This decision is expected to bring uniformity in the application of the law across the country. The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, is a legislation that governs negotiable instruments such as cheques, bills of exchange, and promissory notes. Section 142 of the Act specifically deals with the offence of dishonour of cheques. The Supreme Court’s ruling is based on the interpretation of Section 142, which states that the complaint can be filed in a court within whose local jurisdiction the offence was committed. The court held that the offence of dishonour of a cheque is committed where the bank account of the payee is maintained, as this is where the cheque is dishonoured. The ruling is a result of a petition filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the jurisdiction of the trial court to try a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner argued that the trial court lacked jurisdiction as the cheque was presented at a different location. However, the Supreme Court rejected this argument, stating that the place of presentation of the cheque is not relevant for determining jurisdiction. The court’s decision is expected to have far-reaching implications for banks, financial institutions, and individuals who deal with cheques. It will provide clarity on the jurisdictional aspect of cheque dishonour cases, reducing confusion and inconsistencies in the application of the law. The ruling will also help in expediting the disposal of such cases, as complaints will now be filed in the correct jurisdiction. Furthermore, the decision will reduce the burden on courts, as cases will not be transferred from one court to another due to jurisdictional issues. The Supreme Court’s judgment is a significant development in the field of banking and finance law, and it will have a positive impact on the economy. The court’s ruling is also expected to reduce the number of appeals and revisions filed in higher courts, as the jurisdictional issue will now be settled at the trial court level. In addition, the decision will provide relief to payees who have been facing difficulties in recovering their dues due to jurisdictional issues. The Supreme Court’s judgment is a testament to the Indian judiciary’s commitment to providing clarity and consistency in the application of the law. The ruling will be welcomed by banks, financial institutions, and individuals who deal with cheques, as it will provide a clear understanding of the jurisdictional aspect of cheque dishonour cases. The decision will also contribute to the development of banking and finance law in India, providing a framework for the resolution of disputes related to cheque dishonour. Overall, the Supreme Court’s ruling is a significant development that will have a positive impact on the economy and the banking sector. It will provide clarity, consistency, and relief to those affected by cheque dishonour, and it will contribute to the growth and development of the Indian economy.

Source