The Rajya Sabha was adjourned on Wednesday amid a ruckus over the CISF row, which has sparked a heated debate about the role of Home Minister Amit Shah in the functioning of the House. The Opposition parties have been alleging that Shah is running the House, and the CISF row has only added fuel to the fire. The Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) has been at the center of the controversy, with the Opposition claiming that the force is being used to intimidate and harass MPs. The CISF has been deployed in the Parliament premises, and the Opposition has been objecting to their presence, citing concerns about the safety and security of MPs. The issue came to a head on Wednesday when the Rajya Sabha was adjourned due to the ruckus, with the Opposition demanding that the CISF be withdrawn from the Parliament premises. The government, however, has maintained that the CISF is necessary for the security of the Parliament, and that their presence is not a threat to the MPs. The CISF row has also sparked a debate about the powers of the Home Minister, with the Opposition alleging that Shah is using the force to exert his influence over the House. The Home Minister has denied these allegations, but the Opposition remains unconvinced. The CISF row is not the only issue that has been causing tension in the Rajya Sabha, with the Opposition also objecting to the government’s handling of various other issues, including the economy and national security. The government, however, has maintained that it is committed to the safety and security of the country, and that it will not be swayed by the Opposition’s demands. The CISF row has also sparked a debate about the role of the Parliament in the functioning of the country, with some arguing that the House is being reduced to a mere rubber stamp. The Opposition has been demanding that the government take steps to address their concerns, but so far, there has been no breakthrough. The CISF row is likely to continue to be a major issue in the coming days, with the Opposition determined to press their demands. The government, however, remains adamant that the CISF is necessary for the security of the Parliament, and that their presence will not be withdrawn. The issue has also sparked a debate about the relationship between the government and the Opposition, with some arguing that the two sides need to work together to address the challenges facing the country. The CISF row has also highlighted the need for greater transparency and accountability in the functioning of the Parliament, with some arguing that the House needs to be more open and responsive to the needs of the people. The issue is likely to continue to be a major topic of discussion in the coming days, with the Opposition determined to press their demands and the government remaining adamant that the CISF is necessary for the security of the Parliament. The CISF row has also sparked a debate about the powers of the Home Minister, with some arguing that Shah is using the force to exert his influence over the House. The Opposition has been demanding that the government take steps to address their concerns, but so far, there has been no breakthrough. The CISF row is likely to continue to be a major issue in the coming days, with the Opposition determined to press their demands. The government, however, remains adamant that the CISF is necessary for the security of the Parliament, and that their presence will not be withdrawn. The issue has also sparked a debate about the role of the Parliament in the functioning of the country, with some arguing that the House is being reduced to a mere rubber stamp. The Opposition has been demanding that the government take steps to address their concerns, but so far, there has been no breakthrough. The CISF row has also highlighted the need for greater transparency and accountability in the functioning of the Parliament, with some arguing that the House needs to be more open and responsive to the needs of the people. The issue is likely to continue to be a major topic of discussion in the coming days, with the Opposition determined to press their demands and the government remaining adamant that the CISF is necessary for the security of the Parliament.