The Commission on Higher Education (CHED) has recently flagged Cebu Normal University (CNU) for its abrupt decision to shift to 100% online learning, leaving students and faculty members in a state of uncertainty. According to reports, CNU made the sudden shift without prior consultation with stakeholders, including students, parents, and faculty members. This move has sparked concerns among students, who are worried about the quality of education they will receive through online learning. Many students have expressed their dissatisfaction with the sudden shift, citing concerns about the lack of face-to-face interaction with instructors and the potential for technical issues. Faculty members have also expressed their concerns, stating that they were not adequately prepared to handle the sudden shift to online learning. CHED has called on CNU to explain the sudden shift, citing concerns about the potential impact on the quality of education. The commission has also reminded CNU that any changes to its academic programs must be approved by CHED before implementation. CNU has defended its decision, stating that the shift to online learning is necessary to ensure the safety of students and faculty members amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. However, students and faculty members have argued that the sudden shift is not justified, given that the university has not provided adequate support for online learning. The controversy has sparked a wider debate about the role of online learning in higher education, with some arguing that it is a necessary step to ensure the continuity of education amidst the pandemic. Others have argued that online learning is not a substitute for face-to-face instruction, citing concerns about the quality of education and the potential for students to fall behind. The issue has also raised concerns about the digital divide, with some students lacking access to the necessary technology and internet connectivity to participate in online learning. CHED has reminded universities that they must ensure that all students have access to the necessary resources to participate in online learning. The commission has also called on universities to provide adequate support for students, including mental health support and academic advising. In response to the controversy, CNU has announced that it will provide additional support for students, including online tutoring and mental health support. However, students and faculty members remain skeptical, citing concerns about the quality of education and the potential for students to fall behind. The controversy has sparked a wider debate about the future of higher education, with some arguing that online learning is the future of education. Others have argued that face-to-face instruction is still the best way to deliver education, citing concerns about the quality of education and the potential for students to fall behind. The issue has also raised concerns about the role of CHED in regulating higher education, with some arguing that the commission must do more to ensure that universities are providing quality education. CHED has reminded universities that they must comply with its regulations, including those related to online learning. The commission has also called on universities to prioritize the needs of students, including providing adequate support for online learning. In conclusion, the controversy surrounding CNU’s shift to 100% online learning has sparked a wider debate about the role of online learning in higher education. While some argue that online learning is necessary to ensure the continuity of education amidst the pandemic, others have argued that it is not a substitute for face-to-face instruction. CHED has reminded universities that they must prioritize the needs of students, including providing adequate support for online learning. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how CNU and other universities will respond to the concerns of students and faculty members.