The recent eviction drive in Assam has sparked controversy, with many criticizing the government’s actions as inhumane. However, Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma has defended the move, stating that it is necessary to maintain law and order in the state. Sarma has urged the citizens of Assam not to provide shelter to the evicted families, citing that the government is working to relocate them to their original place of origin. The eviction drive has affected thousands of people, with many left homeless and without access to basic necessities. The government has claimed that the evicted families were living on encroached land, and that the eviction is necessary to protect the state’s resources. However, opposition parties and human rights groups have condemned the move, stating that it is a violation of human rights. The issue has also sparked tensions between different communities in the state, with some groups accusing the government of targeting specific communities. Despite the controversy, the government has maintained that the eviction drive is necessary to maintain peace and stability in the state. The Chief Minister has also stated that the government is working to provide rehabilitation to the affected families, and that they will be provided with alternative housing and livelihood opportunities. However, many have questioned the government’s claims, citing that the rehabilitation process has been slow and inadequate. The issue has also raised concerns about the rights of marginalized communities, with many accusing the government of ignoring their plight. The Assam government has faced criticism from various quarters, including opposition parties, human rights groups, and civil society organizations. The issue has also sparked debates about the role of the government in protecting the rights of its citizens, and the need for a more nuanced approach to addressing the complex issues facing the state. The eviction drive has also highlighted the need for a more effective and efficient rehabilitation process, one that takes into account the needs and concerns of the affected families. The government has claimed that the eviction drive is part of a larger effort to protect the state’s resources and maintain law and order, but many have questioned the motives behind the move. The issue has also raised concerns about the impact on the state’s economy, with many businesses and industries affected by the eviction drive. The Assam government has faced criticism for its handling of the situation, with many accusing the government of being insensitive to the plight of the affected families. The issue has also sparked tensions between the state government and the central government, with some accusing the central government of not doing enough to address the situation. The eviction drive has also highlighted the need for a more coordinated approach to addressing the complex issues facing the state, one that involves all stakeholders and takes into account the needs and concerns of all communities. The government has claimed that the eviction drive is necessary to maintain peace and stability in the state, but many have questioned the effectiveness of the move. The issue has also raised concerns about the rights of women and children, who are often the most vulnerable members of society. The Assam government has faced criticism for its handling of the situation, with many accusing the government of not doing enough to protect the rights of women and children. The eviction drive has also highlighted the need for a more nuanced approach to addressing the complex issues facing the state, one that takes into account the needs and concerns of all communities. The government has claimed that the eviction drive is part of a larger effort to protect the state’s resources and maintain law and order, but many have questioned the motives behind the move. The issue has also raised concerns about the impact on the state’s environment, with many accusing the government of not doing enough to protect the state’s natural resources. The Assam government has faced criticism for its handling of the situation, with many accusing the government of being insensitive to the plight of the affected families. The issue has also sparked debates about the role of the government in protecting the rights of its citizens, and the need for a more effective and efficient rehabilitation process.