The concept of ‘One Nation, One Election’ has been gaining traction in India, with experts weighing in on its potential benefits. According to NK Singh, the chairman of the 15th Finance Commission, simultaneous elections could lead to a significant reduction in disruptions caused by frequent polls. This, in turn, could result in increased economic growth and development. Prachi Mishra, a leading economist, also echoed similar sentiments, stating that the current system of frequent elections can be detrimental to the economy. The ‘One Nation, One Election’ proposal suggests that all elections, including parliamentary, state, and local body polls, be held simultaneously. This would not only reduce the financial burden on the government but also minimize the disruptions caused by frequent elections. Experts believe that this could lead to a more stable and predictable business environment, which is essential for attracting investments and promoting economic growth. Furthermore, simultaneous elections could also lead to a reduction in the cost of elections, which is currently estimated to be around Rs 50,000 crore. The Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) has been tasked with examining the feasibility of the ‘One Nation, One Election’ proposal. NK Singh and Prachi Mishra recently appeared before the JPC to share their views on the matter. During their testimony, they highlighted the potential benefits of simultaneous elections, including reduced disruptions, increased economic growth, and improved governance. They also emphasized the need for a more stable and predictable political environment, which is essential for promoting economic development. The ‘One Nation, One Election’ proposal has been backed by several political parties, including the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). However, some opposition parties have expressed reservations about the proposal, citing concerns about the potential impact on federalism and the rights of states. Despite these concerns, experts believe that simultaneous elections could be a game-changer for India’s economy. By reducing disruptions and promoting a more stable business environment, India could attract more investments and promote economic growth. The ‘One Nation, One Election’ proposal is also seen as a way to reduce the influence of money power in politics, which is a major concern in India. By holding all elections simultaneously, the government could reduce the financial burden on candidates and parties, which would help to minimize the influence of money power. Additionally, simultaneous elections could also lead to a more representative and inclusive political system, which is essential for promoting social and economic development. The JPC is expected to submit its report on the ‘One Nation, One Election’ proposal soon, which will provide further clarity on the feasibility and potential benefits of the proposal. In the meantime, experts continue to debate the merits of simultaneous elections, with some arguing that it could be a major step forward for India’s economy and political system. Others, however, have expressed concerns about the potential impact on federalism and the rights of states. As the debate continues, one thing is clear: the ‘One Nation, One Election’ proposal has the potential to be a major game-changer for India’s economy and political system. With its potential to reduce disruptions, promote economic growth, and improve governance, the proposal is definitely worth considering. The government and the JPC must carefully examine the feasibility and potential benefits of the proposal, taking into account the concerns and reservations expressed by various stakeholders. Ultimately, the decision to implement the ‘One Nation, One Election’ proposal will depend on a careful balancing of the potential benefits and drawbacks. But one thing is certain: the proposal has the potential to be a major step forward for India’s economy and political system, and it is definitely worth exploring further.