Trump Revives 2020 Naturalisation Format for US Citizenship Test, Citing Need for Stricter Standards

The United States citizenship test, a crucial step for immigrants seeking to become naturalised citizens, is undergoing a significant change. The Trump administration has announced plans to revert to the 2020 naturalisation format, which was previously used before being replaced by a revised version. This decision has sparked debate among immigration advocates and lawmakers, with some arguing that the move is an attempt to restrict access to citizenship. The current test, which was introduced in 2020, consists of 10 questions, with applicants required to answer at least 6 correctly to pass. However, the Trump administration has expressed concerns that the test is too easy, allowing applicants to pass without demonstrating a sufficient understanding of American history, government, and values. The revised test, which will be implemented in the coming months, will feature more challenging questions and a greater emphasis on civic knowledge. Applicants will be required to answer at least 12 out of 20 questions correctly to pass, with a greater focus on topics such as the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the principles of American democracy. The move has been welcomed by some lawmakers, who argue that the test should be more rigorous to ensure that new citizens have a deeper understanding of American values and institutions. However, immigration advocates have expressed concerns that the revised test will disproportionately affect certain groups, such as the elderly, those with limited education, and non-English speakers. They argue that the test should be more accessible and inclusive, rather than creating additional barriers to citizenship. The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced that the revised test will be implemented in a phased manner, with applicants who have already filed for naturalisation being allowed to take the current test. The agency has also announced plans to provide additional resources and study materials to help applicants prepare for the revised test. Despite the controversy surrounding the revised test, the Trump administration has maintained that the move is necessary to ensure that new citizens are fully integrated into American society. The decision has also sparked a wider debate about the role of citizenship tests in the naturalisation process, with some arguing that they are an essential tool for promoting civic knowledge and others arguing that they are a barrier to inclusion. As the revised test is implemented, it is likely that the debate will continue, with lawmakers and immigration advocates closely monitoring the impact on applicants. The US citizenship test has a long history, dating back to the early 20th century, and has undergone several revisions over the years. The test is designed to assess an applicant’s knowledge of American history, government, and values, as well as their ability to read, write, and speak English. The test is typically administered by USCIS officers, who also conduct interviews with applicants to assess their eligibility for citizenship. The naturalisation process can be complex and time-consuming, with applicants required to meet certain eligibility requirements, such as being at least 18 years old, being a permanent resident, and having good moral character. The revised test is likely to have a significant impact on the naturalisation process, with applicants facing a more challenging assessment of their civic knowledge. The Trump administration has argued that the revised test is necessary to ensure that new citizens are fully prepared for the responsibilities of citizenship, including voting, serving on a jury, and participating in the democratic process. However, immigration advocates have expressed concerns that the revised test will create additional barriers to citizenship, particularly for vulnerable groups such as the elderly and those with limited education. As the debate continues, it is likely that the revised test will be closely monitored by lawmakers, immigration advocates, and the media, with a focus on its impact on applicants and the naturalisation process as a whole.

Source