Fri. Aug 1st, 2025

In a shocking turn of events, the Ghana Tertiary Education Commission (GTEC) has demanded that Hassan Ayariga, a Ghanaian presidential candidate, provide proof of his PhD credentials. This comes after allegations surfaced that Ayariga has been misusing the ‘Doctor’ title, sparking widespread controversy. The GTEC’s move is aimed at verifying the authenticity of Ayariga’s PhD claims, which have been shrouded in mystery. According to reports, Ayariga has been using the ‘Doctor’ title in his official capacity as a presidential candidate, despite concerns over the legitimacy of his PhD. The GTEC’s demand for proof has sent shockwaves through the Ghanaian political landscape, with many calling for transparency and accountability. Ayariga’s camp has yet to respond to the GTEC’s request, fueling speculation about the validity of his PhD claims. The controversy surrounding Ayariga’s PhD has raised questions about the integrity of Ghana’s educational system and the ease with which individuals can claim false credentials. The GTEC’s actions are seen as a step in the right direction, as the commission seeks to uphold the standards of tertiary education in Ghana. The demand for proof has also sparked a wider debate about the importance of verifying academic credentials in public life. As the controversy continues to unfold, many are watching with bated breath to see how Ayariga’s camp will respond to the GTEC’s demands. The Ghanaian public is eager to know the truth about Ayariga’s PhD claims, and the GTEC’s actions are seen as a crucial step towards uncovering the facts. The incident has also highlighted the need for greater transparency and accountability in Ghanaian politics, where the misuse of academic titles can have serious consequences. The GTEC’s move is a testament to the commission’s commitment to upholding the integrity of Ghana’s educational system. As the investigation continues, it remains to be seen whether Ayariga’s PhD claims will be substantiated or discredited. The outcome of the GTEC’s inquiry will have significant implications for Ayariga’s presidential campaign and the wider Ghanaian political landscape. The controversy surrounding Ayariga’s PhD has also raised questions about the role of regulatory bodies in ensuring the integrity of academic credentials. The GTEC’s actions demonstrate the importance of robust regulatory frameworks in preventing the misuse of academic titles. In conclusion, the demand for proof of Ayariga’s PhD credentials has sparked a national conversation about the importance of academic integrity and transparency in public life. As the controversy continues to unfold, it is clear that the GTEC’s actions will have far-reaching implications for Ghanaian politics and education. The incident serves as a reminder of the need for vigilance in ensuring the integrity of academic credentials and the importance of regulatory bodies in upholding the standards of tertiary education. The Ghanaian public will be watching closely as the investigation continues, eager to uncover the truth about Ayariga’s PhD claims. The outcome of the GTEC’s inquiry will be a significant test of the commission’s commitment to upholding the integrity of Ghana’s educational system. With the controversy showing no signs of abating, it remains to be seen how Ayariga’s camp will respond to the GTEC’s demands and what the ultimate outcome will be.

Source