In a shocking turn of events, the Ghanaian government’s accreditation board, GTEC, has demanded that presidential candidate Hassan Ayariga provide proof of his PhD credentials. This comes after allegations surfaced that Ayariga has been misusing the ‘Doctor’ title, sparking widespread controversy and debate. Ayariga, the founder of the All People’s Congress (APC), has been a prominent figure in Ghanaian politics, and his academic credentials have been called into question. The GTEC’s demand for proof of Ayariga’s PhD has sent shockwaves throughout the country, with many calling for transparency and accountability. The allegations against Ayariga are not new, as there have been previous claims that he has been using the ‘Doctor’ title without proper authorization. However, the GTEC’s involvement has brought the issue to the forefront, and Ayariga is now under pressure to provide evidence of his academic qualifications. The Ghanaian government has been cracking down on individuals who misuse academic titles, and Ayariga’s case is being closely watched. If found guilty, Ayariga could face serious consequences, including damage to his reputation and potential legal action. The APC has come to Ayariga’s defense, stating that he has done nothing wrong and that the allegations are politically motivated. However, the GTEC remains adamant that Ayariga must provide proof of his PhD, and the matter is ongoing. The controversy surrounding Ayariga’s PhD has sparked a wider debate about academic integrity and the use of titles in Ghanaian politics. Many are calling for stricter regulations and greater transparency, and the GTEC’s actions are seen as a step in the right direction. As the situation unfolds, Ayariga’s future in politics remains uncertain, and the outcome of the GTEC’s investigation will be closely watched. The Ghanaian public is eagerly awaiting the results, and the controversy has sparked a national conversation about the importance of academic integrity. The GTEC’s demand for proof of Ayariga’s PhD has also raised questions about the vetting process for political candidates, and whether more needs to be done to ensure that candidates are honest about their qualifications. The APC has stated that it stands by Ayariga, but the party’s reputation is also at stake. The controversy has also sparked a discussion about the role of the GTEC in ensuring academic integrity, and whether the organization has the power to investigate and prosecute individuals who misuse academic titles. As the investigation continues, Ayariga’s PhD credentials remain under scrutiny, and the outcome will have significant implications for his future in politics. The Ghanaian government’s commitment to academic integrity is being tested, and the public is watching closely to see how the situation is handled. The controversy surrounding Ayariga’s PhD has also highlighted the need for greater transparency and accountability in Ghanaian politics, and the importance of ensuring that political candidates are honest about their qualifications. The GTEC’s actions are seen as a positive step towards achieving this goal, and the organization’s investigation will be closely watched. In conclusion, the controversy surrounding Hassan Ayariga’s PhD credentials has sparked a national debate about academic integrity and the use of titles in Ghanaian politics. The GTEC’s demand for proof of Ayariga’s PhD has brought the issue to the forefront, and the outcome of the investigation will have significant implications for Ayariga’s future in politics. The Ghanaian public is eagerly awaiting the results, and the controversy has highlighted the need for greater transparency and accountability in Ghanaian politics.