Sri Lankan Transparency Institute Challenges National Audit Amendment Bill

The Transparency Institute Sri Lanka (TISL) has recently challenged the National Audit Amendment Bill, which was tabled in Parliament with the aim of amending the National Audit Act No. 19 of 1971. The TISL has expressed concerns that the proposed amendments could undermine the independence and effectiveness of the National Audit Office, which is responsible for ensuring that public funds are utilized efficiently and effectively. The institute has argued that the bill, if passed, could compromise the ability of the Auditor General to conduct independent audits and investigations, thereby weakening the country’s system of checks and balances. The TISL has also pointed out that the bill does not provide sufficient safeguards to prevent political interference in the audit process, which could lead to a lack of accountability and transparency in the use of public funds. Furthermore, the institute has noted that the bill’s provisions could be used to intimidate or punish auditors who uncover wrongdoing or corruption, thereby undermining the rule of law and good governance. The TISL has called on the government to reconsider the proposed amendments and to engage in a more consultative and transparent process in order to ensure that any changes to the National Audit Act are in the best interests of the country. The institute has also emphasized the importance of strengthening the National Audit Office and ensuring its independence, in order to promote good governance, accountability, and transparency in the use of public funds. The challenge to the National Audit Amendment Bill has been welcomed by civil society organizations and other stakeholders, who have expressed concerns about the potential impact of the bill on democracy and the rule of law in Sri Lanka. The government has defended the bill, arguing that it is necessary to modernize the audit process and to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the National Audit Office. However, critics have argued that the bill’s provisions could be used to undermine the independence of the Auditor General and to compromise the integrity of the audit process. The debate over the National Audit Amendment Bill has highlighted the importance of ensuring that institutions responsible for promoting good governance and accountability are independent, effective, and free from political interference. The TISL’s challenge to the bill has also underscored the need for greater transparency and consultation in the legislative process, in order to ensure that any changes to the law are in the best interests of the country and its citizens. In addition, the challenge has emphasized the importance of protecting the independence and integrity of institutions such as the National Audit Office, which play a critical role in promoting good governance and accountability. The outcome of the challenge to the National Audit Amendment Bill will be closely watched by civil society organizations and other stakeholders, who are concerned about the potential impact of the bill on democracy and the rule of law in Sri Lanka. The TISL’s actions have been seen as a positive step towards promoting transparency and accountability in the use of public funds, and towards ensuring that institutions responsible for good governance are independent and effective. The challenge to the bill has also highlighted the importance of a free and independent media, which can play a critical role in promoting transparency and accountability by reporting on issues of public interest and holding those in power to account.

Source