A Calgary-based artist, Tresa Gibson, has found herself at the center of a copyright infringement dispute. The issue began when Gibson used an image created by another artist without obtaining the necessary permissions. The image in question has gained significant popularity and has been widely shared on social media platforms. Gibson’s use of the image has been deemed unauthorized, prompting the original creator to take legal action. The lawsuit alleges that Gibson’s actions constitute copyright infringement, and the plaintiff is seeking damages and an injunction to prevent further use of the image. Gibson has maintained that she did not intentionally infringe on the copyright, but rather used the image in a transformative manner. However, the plaintiff argues that Gibson’s use of the image was not transformative and therefore does not fall under fair use provisions. The case highlights the importance of understanding copyright laws and obtaining proper permissions before using copyrighted materials. It also raises questions about the nature of fair use and how it applies to artistic works. The dispute is ongoing, with both parties presenting their arguments in court. The outcome of the case will have significant implications for artists and creators who use copyrighted materials in their work. The case also underscores the need for education and awareness about copyright laws and the potential consequences of infringement. Furthermore, the dispute has sparked a wider conversation about the role of social media in copyright infringement, with many arguing that platforms have a responsibility to protect creators’ rights. As the case continues to unfold, it is likely that we will see more discussion about the intersection of art, law, and technology. The Calgary art community is also watching the case closely, as it may have implications for local artists who use copyrighted materials in their work. Ultimately, the outcome of the case will depend on the court’s interpretation of copyright laws and the specific circumstances of Gibson’s use of the image. The case serves as a reminder to artists and creators to prioritize copyright laws and respect the intellectual property rights of others.