The Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) of Pakistan has dismissed 19 complaints that were filed against various judges for hearing cases. The SJC, which is the highest regulatory body for judges in Pakistan, made this decision after thoroughly reviewing each complaint. The complaints were filed by different individuals and organizations, alleging that the judges had acted improperly or shown bias in their decisions. However, after conducting a detailed inquiry, the SJC found no evidence to support these allegations. The council concluded that the judges had acted in accordance with the law and their judicial oath. The SJC’s decision is a significant development in the country’s judicial system, as it upholds the integrity and independence of the judiciary. The council’s chairman, Justice Gulzar Ahmed, presided over the meeting where the complaints were discussed and dismissed. The SJC’s decision is also seen as a positive step towards maintaining the confidence of the public in the judicial system. The council’s actions demonstrate that it is committed to ensuring that judges are held to the highest standards of integrity and professionalism. The SJC’s decision has been welcomed by the legal community, who see it as a vindication of the judiciary’s independence. However, some critics have expressed concerns that the SJC’s decision may be seen as an attempt to shield judges from accountability. The SJC has dismissed complaints against judges in the past, citing lack of evidence or insufficient grounds. The council’s decision is subject to review and appeal, but it is unlikely that the complaints will be revisited. The SJC’s decision highlights the importance of an independent and impartial judiciary in upholding the rule of law. The council’s actions also demonstrate the need for a robust and effective system of accountability for judges. The SJC’s decision is a significant development in the context of Pakistan’s judicial system, which has faced challenges and controversies in recent years. The council’s decision is expected to have implications for the country’s legal system and the public’s perception of the judiciary. The SJC’s commitment to upholding the integrity and independence of the judiciary is a positive step towards promoting the rule of law and ensuring that justice is served. The council’s decision is also a reminder that the judiciary is not above the law and that judges must be held to the highest standards of integrity and professionalism.