New Zealand has recently released its new AI strategy, which outlines the country’s plans to harness the potential of artificial intelligence to drive economic growth and improve living standards. The strategy emphasizes the importance of AI in boosting productivity, enhancing innovation, and creating new job opportunities. However, critics argue that the strategy is long on economic opportunity but short on managing ethical and social risk. They point out that the strategy lacks concrete measures to address concerns around bias, privacy, and job displacement. The strategy also fails to provide a clear framework for regulating AI development and deployment. Furthermore, there are concerns that the strategy’s focus on economic growth may lead to the exploitation of workers and the exacerbation of social inequalities. Despite these criticisms, the government argues that the strategy is a crucial step towards realizing the potential of AI to benefit New Zealanders. The strategy identifies several key areas of focus, including the development of AI talent, the creation of AI-friendly infrastructure, and the promotion of AI adoption across various sectors. The government also plans to establish an AI advisory board to provide guidance on the development and implementation of AI policies. However, the board’s role and responsibilities are not clearly defined, which has raised concerns about its effectiveness. In addition, there are questions about how the strategy will be funded and implemented, with some critics arguing that the government’s commitment to AI development is not matched by sufficient resources. The strategy’s emphasis on economic growth has also led to concerns that social and environmental considerations may be overlooked. For example, there is a risk that the strategy’s focus on AI-driven productivity growth may lead to the displacement of workers in certain sectors, particularly those with lower skill levels. Moreover, the strategy’s lack of attention to ethical concerns may lead to the development of AI systems that perpetuate existing biases and inequalities. To address these concerns, the government needs to provide more detail on how it plans to regulate AI development and deployment, as well as how it will ensure that the benefits of AI are shared fairly across different sectors and communities. Ultimately, the success of New Zealand’s AI strategy will depend on its ability to balance economic growth with social and ethical considerations. The government must work to establish a more comprehensive framework for AI development and deployment, one that prioritizes not only economic growth but also social responsibility and environmental sustainability. By doing so, New Zealand can ensure that the benefits of AI are realized while minimizing its risks and negative consequences.