Fri. Jul 18th, 2025

In a recent statement, former US President Donald Trump expressed his intention to consider taking away Rosie O’Donnell’s US citizenship. This comes after O’Donnell, a well-known American actress and comedian, has been an outspoken critic of Trump. Trump’s statement has sparked controversy and raised questions about the limits of presidential power. O’Donnell has been a vocal opponent of Trump’s policies and has frequently criticized him on social media. Trump’s threat to revoke O’Donnell’s citizenship is seen as a response to her criticism. However, it is unclear whether Trump has the authority to unilaterally revoke someone’s citizenship. The US Constitution grants citizenship to individuals born in the US or naturalized through the immigration process. Revoking citizenship is a complex process that typically requires a court order. Trump’s statement has been met with criticism from many, who argue that it is an attempt to silence his critics. O’Donnell has not commented on Trump’s statement, but her representatives have said that she is not concerned about the threat. The incident has highlighted the ongoing feud between Trump and O’Donnell, which has been ongoing for several years. Trump has a history of clashing with celebrities who criticize him, and O’Donnell is just one of many who have been targeted. The incident has also raised questions about the role of social media in politics and the impact of celebrity criticism on public discourse. Despite the controversy, Trump remains a prominent figure in US politics, and his statements continue to generate significant attention. O’Donnell, on the other hand, has a long history of activism and has been involved in various charitable causes throughout her career. The incident is likely to continue to generate debate and discussion in the coming days. Trump’s threat to revoke O’Donnell’s citizenship is seen as a reflection of his broader approach to criticism, which often involves personal attacks and attempts to intimidate his opponents. The incident has also highlighted the importance of protecting free speech and the need for public figures to be able to criticize those in power without fear of reprisal.

Source