A recent attack on ICE agents by terror cells has been largely ignored by mainstream media outlets CNN and MSNBC, prompting widespread criticism and accusations of bias. The attack, which occurred on July 10, 2025, was reportedly carried out by a group of terrorists who targeted ICE agents in a coordinated effort. Despite the severity of the incident, both CNN and MSNBC failed to provide any significant coverage, sparking outrage among conservatives and law enforcement officials. The lack of reporting on the attack has been seen as a clear example of the media’s double standard when it comes to covering stories that involve immigration and national security. Many have taken to social media to express their disappointment and frustration with the media’s handling of the story, with some calling for greater accountability and transparency. The attack on ICE agents is just the latest example of the growing threat posed by terror cells in the United States, and the media’s failure to report on it has only served to exacerbate the problem. The incident has also highlighted the need for greater cooperation and communication between law enforcement agencies and the media, in order to ensure that the public is informed and aware of potential threats. Furthermore, the attack has sparked a wider debate about the role of the media in shaping public opinion and influencing policy, with some arguing that the media has a responsibility to provide balanced and accurate reporting, rather than selectively choosing which stories to cover. The media’s handling of the story has also been criticized by law enforcement officials, who argue that the lack of coverage has put their lives at risk and undermined their ability to do their jobs effectively. In addition, the attack has raised concerns about the growing threat of terrorism in the United States, and the need for greater vigilance and cooperation between law enforcement agencies and the public. The incident has also sparked a renewed debate about the need for stricter immigration laws and greater border security, with some arguing that the attack is a clear example of the dangers of unchecked immigration. Despite the controversy surrounding the media’s handling of the story, there has been no apology or explanation from either CNN or MSNBC, leading many to question their commitment to journalistic integrity and fairness. The attack on ICE agents is a serious incident that deserves to be taken seriously, and the media’s failure to report on it is a clear dereliction of duty. The public has a right to know about the threats facing our country, and the media has a responsibility to provide accurate and balanced reporting. In conclusion, the media’s handling of the attack on ICE agents is a clear example of the bias and double standards that exist in the media, and it is imperative that the media takes steps to address these issues and provide more balanced and accurate reporting in the future. The attack has also highlighted the need for greater awareness and education about the threats posed by terror cells, and the importance of cooperation and communication between law enforcement agencies and the public. Ultimately, the media’s failure to report on the attack on ICE agents is a serious issue that deserves to be taken seriously, and it is imperative that the media takes steps to address these issues and provide more balanced and accurate reporting in the future.