Biden’s Physician Invokes Fifth Amendment During Deposition

In a shocking turn of events, President Biden’s physician has invoked the Fifth Amendment during a deposition, refusing to answer questions about the president’s health. The doctor, who has been treating Biden for several years, cited their right against self-incrimination as the reason for their silence. The deposition was part of an ongoing investigation into the president’s medical history, which has been the subject of much speculation and controversy. The investigation has been ongoing for several months, with many calling for greater transparency about the president’s health. The Fifth Amendment, which protects individuals from being forced to testify against themselves, is rarely invoked in such cases. The move has sparked widespread criticism, with many accusing the doctor of trying to hide something. The White House has refused to comment on the matter, citing the ongoing investigation. The president’s health has been a topic of concern for many, with some questioning his fitness for office. Despite the controversy, Biden has maintained that he is in good health and capable of performing his duties as president. The doctor’s decision to invoke the Fifth Amendment has only added to the speculation and rumors surrounding the president’s health. The investigation is ongoing, and it remains to be seen what other revelations will come to light. The use of the Fifth Amendment in this case has raised eyebrows, with many wondering what the doctor might be hiding. The president’s health is a matter of public interest, and many are calling for greater transparency and accountability. The doctor’s actions have only added to the controversy, and it remains to be seen how this will all play out. The White House has faced criticism for its handling of the situation, with many accusing them of trying to cover up the truth. The investigation is a complex and ongoing process, with many different factors at play. The president’s health is just one aspect of the larger controversy, which has been ongoing for several months. The use of the Fifth Amendment has added a new layer of complexity to the case, and it remains to be seen what the ultimate outcome will be.

Source