Montreal has decided not to cease the dismantling of homeless encampments, despite a new report urging a different approach. The report highlights the negative impacts of such actions on vulnerable populations, emphasizing the need for alternative solutions. Montreal officials, however, maintain that their current strategy is necessary and effective. They argue that dismantling encampments helps maintain public safety and hygiene, while also encouraging the homeless to seek shelter services. Advocates and experts criticize this approach, stating it exacerbates homelessness and violates human rights. The report suggests providing adequate housing and support services as more humane and sustainable solutions. Montreal’s stance reflects a broader challenge in addressing homelessness, balancing public concerns with the need to protect vulnerable citizens. The decision has sparked debate among policymakers, activists, and the public. Critics argue that without sufficient alternative housing, dismantling encampments only displaces people. Montreal’s approach is part of a larger discussion on urban policies and social justice. The city’s strategy is under scrutiny as homelessness remains a critical issue. The report’s recommendations aim to guide more compassionate and effective policies. Montreal’s refusal to change its approach highlights the complexity of the issue. The situation underscores the need for comprehensive solutions addressing the root causes of homelessness. The debate continues as stakeholders seek to find a balance between public order and human dignity.